最近的Linode的Atlanta的VPS，国内江苏电信连接的速度又慢死了：
https://www.linode.com/speedtest
-》
【2017-11-16 晚上】
http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin
【2017-11-17 早上 09:00】
看了：
Sugarhosts主机的速度怎么样？ | Sugarhosts主机评论
【糖果主机Sugarhosts】5大机房速评测及国内购买机房推荐-蜗牛789
-》国内访问速度貌似真的很好？
SugarHosts洛杉矶MC机房VPS主机配置、速度及UnixBench跑分综合评测 | 老左博客
但是：“每次看到SugarHosts评测, 基本都是好评居多, 今天终于下定决心购入一台vps, 用电信, 移动, 华数测试速度, 移动稍好, 但其它掉包率在10%以上, 马上申请退, 结果是不支持任何理由退, 就是不退, 很有国人风范, 给大家提个醒了
2015-08-01 下午 10:24 [回复]
jessy:
刚买他们家的主机，网速不稳定，延迟大，服务态度差，建议不要购买。比他家好的到处都是
2015-08-09 下午 5:28 [回复]
老左:
你买的哪个机房的？洛杉矶MC的最近普遍有点不稳定，直连的还可以。”
Linux SSD VPS Hosting | XEN Technology | High Performance Hosting – SugarHosts
官网SSD的VPS只有：
价格和Linode但是差不多，但是不知道速度如何
太贵，买不起
sugarhosts VPS 网速 vs Linode VPS
四大 VPS 对比评测：Linode vs. DigitalOcean vs. Lightsail vs. Vultr – 小众软件
【总结】
总体感觉，貌似是：
1.优先换
High Performance and Cheap Cloud Servers Deployment – Vultr.com
？
价格：和Linode基本上一样
速度：不清楚，估计比现在好吧
【后记 171121】
又给了自己的crifan.com的Linode的Atalanta测试了：
linode的speedtest下载速度：80KB左右，一般般
去其他测试网址给https://www.crifan.com测速：
http://www.17ce.com/site/http/201710_6436a91b835780148b24b8f644c6de70.html
结果也还是很不好：
-》所以还是要抽空去换服务器才行。
vultr 网速
-》抽空用mtr测速VPS连接速度
-》可以去下载测试 -〉 只能供参考，和实际网站放上去的速度不一定一致。
Largest Cloud Server Network Available – Vultr.com
-》Vultr.com Frequently Asked Questions – Vultr.com
2018-0122 10:30左右：
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping fra-de-ping.vultr.com
PING fra-de-ping.vultr.com (108.61.210.117): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=319.607 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=339.976 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=259.846 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=255.774 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=300.855 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- fra-de-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 255.774/295.212/339.976/32.975 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping par-fr-ping.vultr.com
PING par-fr-ping.vultr.com (108.61.209.127): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=318.180 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=260.467 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=279.899 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=209.558 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- par-fr-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 20.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 209.558/267.026/318.180/39.141 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping ams-nl-ping.vultr.com
PING ams-nl-ping.vultr.com (108.61.198.102): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=189.369 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=193.938 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=202.268 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=195.538 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- ams-nl-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 189.369/195.278/202.268/4.627 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping lon-gb-ping.vultr.com
PING lon-gb-ping.vultr.com (108.61.196.101): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.196.101: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=426.618 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.196.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=513.646 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
64 bytes from 108.61.196.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=793.040 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- lon-gb-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 40.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 426.618/577.768/793.040/156.312 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping sgp-ping.vultr.com
PING sgp-ping.vultr.com (45.32.100.168): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 45.32.100.168: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=158.214 ms
64 bytes from 45.32.100.168: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=158.654 ms
64 bytes from 45.32.100.168: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=159.691 ms
64 bytes from 45.32.100.168: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=158.299 ms
64 bytes from 45.32.100.168: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=159.580 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- sgp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 158.214/158.888/159.691/0.629 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping nj-us-ping.vultr.com
PING nj-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.149.182): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=210.758 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=274.577 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=209.793 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=313.466 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- nj-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 209.793/252.149/313.466/44.074 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=116.553 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=117.448 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=117.399 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=118.097 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=117.805 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 116.553/117.460/118.097/0.520 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping il-us-ping.vultr.com
PING il-us-ping.vultr.com (107.191.51.12): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=364.140 ms
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=369.930 ms
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=372.088 ms
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=420.480 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- il-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 364.140/381.659/420.480/22.601 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping ga-us-ping.vultr.com
PING ga-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.193.166): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.193.166: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=364.376 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.193.166: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=351.274 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.193.166: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=372.788 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- ga-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 351.274/362.813/372.788/8.852 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping fl-us-ping.vultr.com
PING fl-us-ping.vultr.com (104.156.244.232): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 104.156.244.232: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=483.183 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.244.232: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=400.271 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.244.232: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=420.361 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- fl-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 400.271/434.605/483.183/35.315 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping wa-us-ping.vultr.com
PING wa-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.194.105): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=392.265 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=313.280 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=329.487 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=346.255 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- wa-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 313.280/345.322/392.265/29.504 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping tx-us-ping.vultr.com
PING tx-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.224.175): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=203.737 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=202.954 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=202.671 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=202.215 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- tx-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 202.215/202.894/203.737/0.553 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping sjo-ca-us-ping.vultr.com
PING sjo-ca-us-ping.vultr.com (104.156.230.107): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 104.156.230.107: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=299.212 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.230.107: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=268.370 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.230.107: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=250.708 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.230.107: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=247.207 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- sjo-ca-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 247.207/266.374/299.212/20.586 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com
PING lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.219.200): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=253.929 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=235.200 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=257.650 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=210.054 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 210.054/239.208/257.650/18.860 ms
➜ youtubeSubtitle ping syd-au-ping.vultr.com
PING syd-au-ping.vultr.com (108.61.212.117): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=244.187 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=326.743 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=229.055 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=306.740 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=230.254 ms
^C
<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Monaco;"–<- syd-au-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 229.055/267.396/326.743/41.130 ms
-》看来还是日本和新加坡的速度比较不错，大概不到200ms
其他都还是有点慢
-〉如果都能稳定在200多ms，其实我也能接受
-》就怕像现在江苏电信访问Linode的LA的VPS，有时候好有时候坏，那就郁闷了。
Vultr 的东京和洛杉矶机房，哪个更好？ – 知乎
“谷歌的TCP-BBR技术”
-》抽空去试试BBR
锐速？
Vultr各地区机房下载速度测试 Vultr VPS测速地址 – NMB HOST
【总结】
抽空用：
MTR去测试连接速度
继续去看看：
然后抽空继续测速，看看长期是否稳定
抽空查查Google的TCP-BBR是啥，看看所说的加速技术看看效果
抽空也查查锐速是啥，如何加速
2018-01-22 15:10
此刻的速度是：
-》所以至少此刻vultr的（新加坡和日本）速度是比Linode（的atlanta）的速度要快很多的。
2018年最好的国外VPS推荐 —— 购买指南 – 十佳评测
https://www.linode.com/speedtest
2018-03-15 11:00
苏州移动
2018-03-15 11:00测试结果：
newark: 4.4MB/s
fremont: 3MB/s
singapore: 1.2MB/s
tokyo2: 800KB/s
london: 300KB/s
ping的结果：
<code> ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.newark.linode.com PING speedtest.newark.linode.com (50.116.57.237): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.116.57.237: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=253.327 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.57.237: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=259.575 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.57.237: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=280.240 ms ^C --- speedtest.newark.linode.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 253.327/264.381/280.240/11.501 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.atlanta.linode.com PING speedtest.atlanta.linode.com (50.116.39.117): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=298.218 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=321.345 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=342.718 ms ^C --- speedtest.atlanta.linode.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 298.218/320.760/342.718/18.172 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.dallas.linode.com PING speedtest.dallas.linode.com (50.116.25.154): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.116.25.154: icmp_seq=0 ttl=43 time=324.769 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.25.154: icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=343.650 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.25.154: icmp_seq=2 ttl=43 time=264.958 ms ^C --- speedtest.dallas.linode.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 264.958/311.126/343.650/33.543 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.fremont.linode.com PING speedtest.fremont.linode.com (50.116.14.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.116.14.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=200.310 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.14.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=199.732 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.14.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=199.061 ms ^C --- speedtest.fremont.linode.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 199.061/199.701/200.310/0.510 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com PING speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com (139.162.130.8): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 139.162.130.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=193.970 ms 64 bytes from 139.162.130.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=192.356 ms 64 bytes from 139.162.130.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=194.414 ms ^C --- speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 192.356/193.580/194.414/0.884 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.london.linode.com PING speedtest.london.linode.com (176.58.107.39): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 176.58.107.39: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=332.032 ms 64 bytes from 176.58.107.39: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=248.407 ms 64 bytes from 176.58.107.39: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=231.295 ms ^C --- speedtest.london.linode.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 231.295/270.578/332.032/44.013 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.singapore.linode.com PING speedtest.singapore.linode.com (139.162.23.4): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 139.162.23.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=94.941 ms 64 bytes from 139.162.23.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=91.618 ms 64 bytes from 139.162.23.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=94.708 ms ^C --- speedtest.singapore.linode.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 91.618/93.756/94.941/1.515 ms ➜ youtubeSubtitle git:(master) ✗ ping speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com PING speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 139.162.65.37: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=106.285 ms 64 bytes from 139.162.65.37: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=114.874 ms 64 bytes from 139.162.65.37: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=111.919 ms ^C --- speedtest.shg1.linode.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 106.285/111.026/114.874/3.563 ms </code>
还是tokyo2和singapore速度最快
目前可选服务器：
-》如果现在速度慢，而发现其他某个服务器速度快，则去提交工单，申请换位置
抽空继续测测Linode的不同服务器的效果
【已解决】Linode的VPS中的Tokyo2节点机房服务器速度如何
所以还是抽空换到tokyo2去吧。
继续测速：
2018-03-16 14:00
苏州移动
最后只有：atlanta和singapore速度最慢
其他都还不错：
newark
dallas
frankfurt
fremont
tokyo2
london
2018-03-16 23:00
苏州电信
竟然newark速度很慢，而且tokyo2也很慢
只有Fremont速度不错
<code>➜ ~ ping speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com PING speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 139.162.65.37: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=220.902 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 64 bytes from 139.162.65.37: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=220.182 ms ^C --- speedtest.shg1.linode.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 66.7% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 220.182/220.542/220.902/0.360 ms ➜ ~ ping speedtest.atlanta.linode.com PING speedtest.atlanta.linode.com (50.116.39.117): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=382.851 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=383.390 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=381.861 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=381.974 ms 64 bytes from 50.116.39.117: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=381.425 ms ^C --- speedtest.atlanta.linode.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 16.7% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 381.425/382.300/383.390/0.715 ms </code>
2018-03-16 09:30
苏州电信 100M
截至目前：
london：不论电信还是移动，速度都还凑合。高的有2MB，少的也有100多KB，所以也还可以了。
2018-03-18 14:00
苏州电信
london：2.7MB
fremont：2.7MB
frankfurt：300多KB
其他包括atlanta，tokyo2等，速度都是10KB级别的，很慢
-》
还是london速度比较稳定。
2018-03-18 21:00
苏州电信
dallas：3.3MB
london：770KB
newark：200KB
fremont：160KB
frankfurt：120KB
tokyo2:50KB
atlanta，singapore，都是慢到没有速度的
所以，目前结论是：
还是london的速度相对来说，
对于苏州电信和苏州移动，
以及对于不同时间段，
速度都还是能接受的：
最低也有100KB以上
最高有2，3MB
所以算能接受的。
（而其他节点，无法同时满足，移动和电信速度都很好）
【后记】
在把服务器从atlanta更换到london后，再去测速
苏州电信
此刻：
london：700KB
而atlanta：4KB
真的是需要更换。
但是：
此处去ping，速度很不稳定：
<code>➜ naturling_homepage git:(master) ping www.crifan.com PING www.crifan.com (80.85.87.205): 56 data bytes Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=467.688 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=514.606 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=423.856 ms 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=473.253 ms ^C --- www.crifan.com ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 50.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 423.856/469.851/514.606/32.151 ms ➜ naturling_homepage git:(master) ping www.crifan.com PING www.crifan.com (80.85.87.205): 56 data bytes Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=446.347 ms 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=468.326 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=474.171 ms 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=497.147 ms 64 bytes from 80.85.87.205: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=518.721 ms ^C --- www.crifan.com ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 54.5% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 446.347/480.942/518.721/24.866 ms </code>
而浏览器访问crifan.com也还是很慢。
哎，只能说凑合用把。还是不是很完美。