【背景】
对于回复crosstool-ng的mailing list即crossgcc中的单个帖子,
之前已经过了3次了:
【记录】继续尝试去回复mailing list中的某个thread中的单个message
【记录】再次去回复crossgcc邮件列表中的关于cygwin下编译crosstool-ng失败的帖子
【记录】第三次去回复crossgcc邮件列表中的单个message:关于cannot find -lgcc的问题
现在,算是第四次,去回复,其中一个帖子(message):
Crosstool Build Still Fails under Cygwin
【折腾过程】
1.继续去看:
然后得到相关数据为:
Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:25:58 +1200 From: Jeremy Cole-Baker <jeremy at rhtech dot co dot nz> Reply-To: jeremy at rhtech dot co dot nz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: crossgcc at sourceware dot org Subject: Crosstool Build Still Fails under Cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2.然后推算对应的信息:
(1)收件人=to
仍是:
crossgcc at sourceware dot org
即:
[email protected]
(2)抄送人=cc
Jeremy Cole-Baker <jeremy at rhtech dot co dot nz>
即:
Jeremy Cole-Baker <[email protected]>
(3)In-Reply-To=Message-ID中@变“ at ”点变“ dot ”后的值
即:
<[email protected]> |
变为:
<51D12F06 dot 8060404 at rhtech dot co dot nz>
(4)References=Message-ID值
即:
<[email protected]> |
(5)主题=subject
此处,之前没有re: 此处加上,从:
Crosstool Build Still Fails under Cygwin
变为:
Re: Crosstool Build Still Fails under Cygwin
3.然后就可以去发邮件了:
然后去发送.
其中蓝色引用内容,是我拷贝了原文,然后右键粘贴为引用,而得到的效果
-> 不知道是否会变成html的内容。
4.对此点,去对应的:
C:\Users\Administrator.PC-20130611GART\AppData\Roaming\Thunderbird\Profiles\ba6fog6x.default\Mail\mail.crifan.com\Drafts
中看了看对应的实际的内容,发现是正常的纯文本,没有变成html:
5.那就可以去发送了。
看看是否可以正常发送。
结果是:
的确是可以出现在2013-09的thread列表中的:
但是,却没有成为对应的,被回复的帖子的child,而在此
https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2013-09/threads.html
单独列出来了。
正常应该是,在:
https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2013-07/threads.html
中列出来,挂在,被我回复的帖子下面:
所以,此处,还是有点奇怪,还是没有完全搞懂,此处回复单个message所需要的所有的条件的。
6.对应的,去自己的回复出来的帖子:
https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2013-09/msg00002.html
中去看:
对应的内容,还是符合预期的:
Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 22:47:54 +0800 From: Crifan Li <admin at crifan dot com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: crossgcc <crossgcc at sourceware dot org> CC: Jeremy Cole-Baker <jeremy at rhtech dot co dot nz> Subject: Re: Crosstool Build Still Fails under Cygwin In-Reply-To: <51D12F06 dot 8060404 at rhtech dot co dot nz> References: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sjc004.hawkhost.com: authenticated_id: [email protected]
而此刻,突然注意到这行:
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sjc004.hawkhost.com |
所以,要去看看,之前,正常可以发message成为被回复的child的那次:
https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2013-08/msg00051.html
中的:Raw text,看看有没有这个。
发现也有这行:
Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 17:36:28 +0800 From: Crifan Li <admin at crifan dot com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: crossgcc <crossgcc at sourceware dot org> CC: Aijaz Baig <aijazbaig1 dot new at gmail dot com> Subject: Re: cannot build crosstool due to Makefile issues (mixed implicit and normal rules) In-Reply-To: <CAOYrRwoi=BSa+iJcSWEWEA5dbU4zqoSM0N-hq2HHbM8odKyqiA at mail dot gmail dot com> References: <[email protected]> <CAOYrRwoi=BSa+iJcSWEWEA5dbU4zqoSM0N-hq2HHbM8odKyqiA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sjc004.hawkhost.com: authenticated_id: [email protected]
然后两者对比了一下:
发现只有一个不同:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
和
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
此处,不正常的,多了个:
format=flowed
7.然后参考:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2646.txt
看到的解释:
4.1. Generating Format=Flowed When generating Format=Flowed text, lines SHOULD be shorter than 80 characters. As suggested values, any paragraph longer than 79 characters in total length could be wrapped using lines of 72 or fewer characters. While the specific line length used is a matter of aesthetics and preference, longer lines are more likely to require rewrapping and to encounter difficulties with older mailers. It has been suggested that 66 character lines are the most readable. |
基本上,只和那个最大宽度80个字符有关,看来和帖子发送接收,还真没关系。
8.然后再去比较了
正常的:https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2013-08/msg00051.html
错误的:https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2013-09/msg00002.html
结果头部信息中,还是没看出有何异常,也基本都一样的:
【总结】
至此:
还真不太明白,为何此处发帖,没有挂在原帖下面变成child。
抽空再研究吧。
转载请注明:在路上 » 【记录】第四次回复crossgcc的mailing list中单个帖子:关于节省crosstool-ng编译时间